More race table nonsense

Again (and again and again) these idiots do their best to prove that this is not real people playing against each other. I deliberatley searched for tables that PUTANGSUE was playing on. I enjoyed the company of Rookie1965 on both of those tables. Not only does rookie actively play two tables, he has the time to chat on both tables. But it's not real chat. It's mindless and moronic "nh"s to every hand he congratulates the winners that he didn't win on. Which was all of them in my 20 minute stay. One would tend to think that it would be awfully boring to do nothing but lose every hand on two tables for twenty minutes and post "nh" in the chat.

Except that computers don't get bored. Which is why these bogus race tables exist.

During my race table investigation I've come across two other people that have sat in on them, that like me are told they are an unwelcome guest and they should leave. I'm skeptical, I still think it's a cover-up to explain why 2 year olds would play so stupidly. Fortunately, mathematically it doesn't work out. Because the race table is the excuse for someone ending up with millions of chips.

Review this blog and there is a screen shot of Underbos with over 4 million. And another racer with over 1 million. The two claims I've seen about the race table parameters have been the same. First player to 500k wins. The other 8 players pay a bounty of the 20k max buy in to the winner. Under optimum conditions - 9 seat with 499,99.99 going all in and one position sweeps and is the pot and is paid the bounty nets 4,659,999.90. Yet here is a table that has over 5 million chips among the top two. ???

OK, it wasn't a race table - well, that doesn't really work either. Because that's a net loss of the losers of over 250 max buy-ins and rebuys. And this only supports my feeder and vacuum AI theory that it's all AI. Despite your bogus chat made to make you look a little more real. Race table and race tablish type games that are not race table games have the same lingo. It's very limited.

"nh"

"ty"

And my personal favorite - "weeeeeeeeeeeeeee" (said upon winning a big hand.) Thank god noone said "hun" or my brain would have exploded.

Which leads to the third table. 100/200 fixed limit isn't a big stakes game, but I'd call it medium range. Trying to pick out something different to be annoying at, and trying to build Dexter's chip stack since I got screwed over on my first account (no password retrieval option available on UB) this seemed a good choice. And it was for the most part. If I quit at my maximum I would have gained 10%. Pandora was an obvious feeder. Raised most hands, won very few. Eventually, tired of my use of the single biggest weapon in my arsenal - folding like crazy - some chump sits next to me with the max 500k chips. Oooooooooohhhhh, I'm so scared. You have 500k on this site.

The game play over the next half dozen hands was exactly what I expected. This guy won 8k in one tenth the time I won 3k, not because of skill, but simply a matter of getting better cards and better flops. Since I'm used to this, it didn't totally annhilate me. The warning flags were waving.

For good measure, a second 500k position appeared at the table. So pointless. For fixed limit 100/200 something like 5k is all you need to bring in. This was(to the tune of Helen Reddy, I am Woman):

"I am Admin hear me roar,

I've too many chips to ignore,

And I'm gonna kill you with my skill.

I've got players feeding me,
They have them to infinity,
So they aren't worried about a spill"

Nope.

Play to win. Don't play to make me lose.