Bump of old news

One tries not to be too repetitive, but it's not always possible when the same mistakes are being made over and over again. In the category of "making it look for real" I found this table to be highly suspicious, although it wasn't obviously fraudelent.

I lingered for a little over 50 hands since I was extremely ace deficient during the early part. UB did make it up and I was only minorly ace deficient by the end. What raises an eyebrow is that in more than an hours worth of play there was only four lines of chat posted. Pocket888 (strange name - for Omaha hi-Lo pocket 888 pretty much sucks as a starter hand) scored a jack high straight flush and four nines within a span of five hands. The four lines of chat were Big Bundy congratulating him on the two great hands and Pocket thanking him.
In over an hour that's all the chat? No. "Gotta go - girlfriend is ready to go to the movies?" No, "Hi Hun!" (A personal favorite of mine.) No other posts about bad beats? This in and of itself doesn't prove a thing, but as I will be testing them over the course of the next few weeks it will be fun to see if they overkill and I get to sit at a table where the chit chat is fairly insane, or if it remains a ghost town.

If it's for real there's a happy medium. But kudos to UB tonight....this wasn't too bad.