As a reminder, I've said this many times before, so far there hasn't been a decent rebuttal posted about my comments. I hate being repetitive, but as the card play tonight was the usual humdrum non-random crapola I will have to hate being repetitive.
If you Google "Internet Poker is Rigged" you do get one top hit from this pro -
http://www.onlinepoker.net/poker-news/general-poker-news/online-poker-rigged-wsop-winner/6801
Other than this the top hits are loads of bullshit defending the sites on how it's simply a matter of the low quality of cardplay by the angry, frustrated, drunken and repetitive poster. Since I hate being repetitive I will not use the word repetitive or any variant such as 'repeat' again. It's to easy. And as homage to my ex-girlfriend Rhea Pete it would be rude to repeat such repetition. Especially since I've repeatedly down it so many repetitive times.
Jumping back to the first paragraph - I don't want to just think that what separates the Big Laydown from the other poker blogs, both pro and con, is that instead of the card play my focus has shifted to the lack of humanity. Basically, when sitting at a nine player S&G you can expect that at best you're playing against 7 pieces of AI and one admin in control of the table. Since the admins get to toglle cheat mode and are bored out of their skull a real human is a pleasant distraction. And in general since they have limited actual card skill, they do stupid shit like break the time bank rules, post naughty words in chat that don't get ****'ed out.
Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, you are to the South of me and pretty much on a weekly basis at the minimum I get the joy of playing against someone with home court advantage that can- and does- break the simple rules.
The explanation for this can't simply be that they want to read here what they did wrong (although it does give them the chance to make changes and cheat better.) It can't simply be fear of computer viruses by visiting dangerous websites mpicking up pictures of Asian hotties.
My personal opinion is that the daily coursem of the job has just become too repetive, and repeating the repition has repeatedly repeated the mundane repition and while trying to suck the last money out of real players before repeating Full Tilt's demise they repeatedly try and fail to struggle to make it look for real.
I can't repeat this mistake of giving real cash to poker sites. I never have and can't play for real money. I rpeat, it's not like I would. I've seen WAY too much repition of the annoying bad beats, non-random cards, infinite loops(explanation on this comment - another repitition reference) and avatrs of a tapir )which is close to a backward spelling of repeat I can think of on short notice.
Personally I thought I would have at least 20 million play chips on the big three sites by now, I would be hugely bored and move on to other topics that piss me off like the GOP nomination race and attention whore Kim Kardashian's wedding, but here I am still interested in busting on poker.
So this begs the question -
How much did Kim K. pay you to keep her off my radar? She's not Asian, so it must have been a lot.

No comments:
Post a Comment