
I gave them a pretty long vacation from me since Absolute and Full Tilt had been so bad. Lately I've been messing with them a bit and strangely.....
The high level fixed limit Omaha Hi-Lo games have been pretty reasonable. I win some hands, I lose some hands. I fold hands that should be folded. I call hands that speculate and I occasionally catch and win. I don't catch and I lose. There are still some players that call almost every hand without a logical pre-flop fold that make me wonder how they got enough chips to sit at the table. But, gone are the days of the fixed limit RAISE RAISE RAISE RAISE bingo/lotto bs.
So, since the Omaha has been too normal I've also tried some attempts at the Elimination Blackjack which is probably my all time favorite story on rigged internet games.
EB was put out in Beta testing long before it should have been. The "players" were obviously pre-programmed to act a certain way based on their cards. I feasted on how these players universally split ten value cards every single freaking time they got. Now, that is gone and a little bit more rationality has entered the balckjack.
Thank you for proving my point. Ultra-aggressive play on truly random cards is a losing proposition. And there are still way too many tables that think that BETMAX, BETMAX,BETMAX, etc... is the way to gamble. Because you are like Freckledmom and with the click of a button you have millions of chips. You don't have to work for them like I do.
Also, if the elimination BJ on UB was random players and real betting, why haven't they offered it at a higher buy in then 1000k? Because they're still working on the AI and they haven't had enough play-testing from sane players like me to be sure that someone doesn't score hundreds of thousands/millions of free money chips off of it.
They will try to make me believe that the screenshot of the insane double-down was just someone not paying attention. I know this ultra-aggressive player was just pre-programmed that way.
No comments:
Post a Comment